legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Christopher P.
Guadalupe G. (Mother) appeals from the December 28, 2011 and January 27, 2012 jurisdictional and dispositional orders of the juvenile court adjudging minors Christopher P. and Richard P. dependents of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300, subdivisions (a) (serious bodily injury), (b) (failure to protect), and (j) (abuse of sibling).[1] Mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s jurisdictional findings and argues that the dispositional orders should be reversed or modified. We conclude the jurisdictional findings were supported by the evidence and the court did not abuse its discretion in making the dispositional orders. We affirm the orders of the court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale