legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re F.S.
It was alleged in a supplemental juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 777)[1] that appellant, F.S., violated probation by failing to complete juvenile sex offender counseling. On March 26, 2012, appellant admitted the allegation, and at the disposition hearing on April 10, 2012, the court ordered appellant, who at that time was a little less than seven weeks shy of his 20th birthday, committed to juvenile hall for four years, with credit of 281 days for time served, and ordered, pursuant to section 208.5, that appellant be delivered to the custody of the county sheriff to serve the term imposed in county jail.
On appeal, appellant’s sole contention is that the juvenile court abused its discretion in ordering appellant to serve his commitment in county jail. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale