In re Nathan M.
Candace M. (Mother) appeals from a dispositional order, seeking review of jurisdictional findings as to her children Hannah M., C.M., Isaiah M., and Nathan M. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b), (d), and (j).[1] We determine that substantial evidence supports jurisdictional findings made pursuant to section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d) as to Hannah, C.M., and Isaiah, but must be reversed as to Nathan. We further determine that substantial evidence supports jurisdictional findings made pursuant to section 300, subdivision (j) as to Hannah, C.M., Isaiah, and Nathan, and affirm those jurisdictional findings.
Comments on In re Nathan M.