C.C. v. Superior Court
C.C. (Mother) seeks extraordinary relief from an order of the San Francisco City and County Superior Court, Juvenile Division, entered September 28, 2012, which terminated her reunification services after a six-month status review hearing, and set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] to select a permanent plan for J.C. (born October 2011). Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding that the San Francisco Human Services Agency (Agency) offered or provided her with reasonable services, and the Agency further failed to provide her with sufficient visitation with her infant son, contrary to the court’s visitation order. We conclude substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s finding concerning reasonable services, and find no error in the Agency’s efforts to provide visitation. Accordingly, we deny Mother’s petition on the merits.[2]
Comments on C.C. v. Superior Court