In re Marco W.
Karen W. (“Motherâ€) appeals the juvenile dependency court’s orders sustaining the jurisdictional allegations in the juvenile dependency petitions concerning her son Marco W. and daughter M.W. under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 300. Before this court, Mother asserts a number of errors. First she claims that the court erred in denying her request for discovery of the social worker’s case activity logs, as well as her request to have the social worker present at the jurisdiction/disposition hearing. Mother also claims insufficient evidence supported the court’s exercise of jurisdiction under section 300, subdivision (b), both with respect to the allegations concerning her and those allegations pertaining to the children’s father. For the reasons stated herein, we conclude that the court did not err in denying Mother’s discovery request and the request that the social worker attend the hearing was untimely. Further, we conclude that sufficient evidence supported the jurisdictional findings. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on In re Marco W.