In re C.T.

C.T. (referred to as Father) appeals an order made at a post-permanency plan hearing for his son, C.T., contending substantial evidence does not support the juvenile court’s visitation order. We conclude the juvenile court’s visitation order was proper.

Comments on In re C.T.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced