P. v. Patala
Ronald Allen Patala (appellant) pleaded no contest to one count of receiving a stolen motor vehicle (Pen. Code, § 496d, subd. (a))[1] in exchange for a suspended three-year prison term. He subsequently violated probation and sentence was executed. On appeal, appellant contends that: 1) the restitution fine imposed as a condition of probation is unauthorized with execution of the prison term; 2) the court minutes and abstract of judgment must be amended to reflect the proper amount of the restitution fine; 3) the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the proper conviction date and manner; and 4) the abstract of judgment must reflect the fines and fees imposed. We agree with his last two contentions, but in all other respects affirm.
Comments on P. v. Patala