In re C.H.
C.M. (Mother) appeals after the termination of her parental rights to C.H. at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] hearing. Mother claims on appeal as follows: (1) the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying Mother’s section 388 petition because she established a material change of circumstances and proved the modification would be in C.H.’s best interests; and (2) the juvenile court erred by failing to apply the parental benefit exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i).
Comments on In re C.H.