P. v. Vasquez
Defendant Ever Vasquez appeals from the judgment following his convictions for robbery (Pen. Code,[1] § 211) and making criminal threats (§ 422). He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony at trial regarding the details of a prior uncharged robbery allegedly committed by Vasquez against the same victim. We disagree. However, as the Attorney General concedes, pursuant to section 654 we must modify the sentence on the count for criminal threats to order that it be stayed, and not run concurrent to the sentence on the robbery offense, because the two crimes arose from one indivisible course of conduct. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Vasquez