Insyst v. Applied Materials
In 2010 this court reversed a judgment in plaintiff Insyst, Ltd.'s action against defendant Applied Materials, Inc. based on an error granting summary adjudication of Insyst's claim of misappropriation of trade secrets. Upon remand, Applied again moved for summary adjudication, which the superior court granted on a new showing of undisputed facts. Insyst again appeals, contending that the lower court incorrectly found that equitable estoppel did not save the action from the bar of the three-year statute of limitations, Civil Code section 3426.6. We will affirm the judgment.
Comments on Insyst v. Applied Materials