In re Isaiah R.
Tamika B., mother of dependent child Isaiah R., appeals a juvenile court order summarily denying her petition for modification under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388,[1] by which she sought reunification services and unsupervised visits with Isaiah. Tamika contends she was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on her section 388 petition because she presented prima facie evidence her circumstances had changed and it was in Isaiah's best interests to grant the requested modification for reunification services.[2] We affirm the order.
Comments on In re Isaiah R.