In re Nathaniel M.
Michael M., father of the minors, appeals from the judgment of the juvenile court removing the minors from his custody and ordering reunification services. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 358, 361, 395.[1]) Father contends the court erred in removing the minors from his custody because there was insufficient evidence of detriment to the minors if returned to him. We affirm.
Comments on In re Nathaniel M.