Chapman v. Kensington Park Residential Prop. Owners Assn.
Plaintiffs Mindy Chapman and Megan Shapiro appeal a judgment in favor of defendant Kensington Park Residential Property Owners Association (the Association) after a court trial on their toxic mold property damage and personal injury action. We conclude, among other things, that: 1) the trial court's "nonsuit" was in fact the grant of a "motion for judgment" under Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8[1]; 2) the court did not err by granting judgment after the presentation of plaintiffs' case because there was insufficient proof that water from the Association's common areas caused mold contamination on Chapman's property; and 3) the court did not abuse its discretion by limiting the evidence plaintiffs' expert witnesses could present at trial. We affirm.
Comments on Chapman v. Kensington Park Residential Prop. Owners Assn.