Hamel v. Beeson
Defendants Ron Beeson, Deanna Copeland, and Daniel Copeland appeal from the superior court’s order denying their special motion to strike (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16)[1] the complaint of plaintiffs Cheryl Hamel and Eli Hamel, a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Cheryl Hamel.[2] They argue that the complaint or at least some of the causes of action arose out of their exercise of free speech rights and plaintiffs cannot establish a probability of prevailing on the merits. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on Hamel v. Beeson