P. v. Chavez
Steve Chavez appeals from the judgment entered upon his convictions by jury of two counts of resisting an executive officer (Pen. Code, § 69).[1] After granting appellant’s Romero[2] motion and striking his prior felony strike, the trial court sentenced him to 16 months in state prison. Appellant contends that (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it allowed defense witnesses to be impeached with prior convictions of child-sex offenses, (2) the trial court improperly denied his motion to reduce the charged offenses to misdemeanors, and (3) the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement of judgment.
We affirm with directions.
Comments on P. v. Chavez