In re M.H.
This court previously denied a petition for extraordinary writ relief filed by appellant Marcus H. (father) after the juvenile court set a permanency planning hearing as to his daughter, M.H. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26). (Marcus H. v. Superior Court (May 13, 2011, A131461) [nonpub. opn.].) The juvenile court thereafter terminated father’s parental rights, concluding that father had not established that an exception to the termination of parental rights applied. This timely appeal followed.
On June 7, 2012, father’s appointed appellate counsel filed a no issues statement in accordance with In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 and In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded that there were no arguable issues to raise on appeal. Father wrote to this court on July 3, acknowledging that he made mistakes early in the proceedings, but stating that he wants to maintain a relationship with the minor.
Comments on In re M.H.