Brewster v. Blackshear
Plaintiff and appellant Arthur J. Brewster appeals from two judgments of dismissal following orders granting the demurrers of defendants Mary Blackshear, her attorney Linda Rose Fessler, and The Law Offices of Linda Rose Fessler in this action to set aside a judgment.[1] Brewster contends: 1) the hearing date for Blackshear’s demurrer was untimely; and 2) the doctrine of res judicata does not apply because the complaint alleged extrinsic fraud. We conclude Brewster has failed to show the hearing date was untimely and the allegations of the complaint do not allege extrinsic fraud, and therefore, we affirm.
Comments on Brewster v. Blackshear