In re Ryan B.
Matthew B. (father) appealed from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to his son, 16-month-old Ryan.[1] After reviewing the entire record, father’s court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court she had found no arguable issues to raise in this appeal. Counsel requested and this court granted leave for father to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error does exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.)
Father has since written this court to ask that we reverse the termination order because he feels he has been unjustly treated during earlier phases of Ryan’s dependency. On review, we conclude father’s letter does not amount to a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error exists.
Comments on In re Ryan B.