P. v. Saeteurn
Appointed counsel for defendant Kao Seng Saeteurn asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. We note that the trial court did not identify all fines and fees on the record, and that the abstract of judgment does not specify all the fines and fees imposed upon defendant. Nor does the abstract reflect the date of conviction. Therefore, we remand the matter to the trial court to set forth the fines and fees on the record, and to amend the abstract of judgment to reflect the fines and fees imposed upon defendant and the date of conviction. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Saeteurn