legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re P.H.
Michael R. (Father) and F.H. (Mother) appeal the juvenile court order terminating their parental rights to their son P., pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Father contends he did not receive notice of the August 31, 2011 continued section 366.26 hearing where his parental rights were terminated. Mother claims there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that P. was adoptable and that the juvenile court erred in its refusal to apply the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) parental benefit exception.[2] We affirm the juvenile court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale