P. v. Yancy
A jury convicted Christopher Bernard Yancy of murder and found true a special allegation he had used a deadly or dangerous weapon. On appeal Yancy contends the court erred in denying his request for a mistrial after the jury was told Yancy’s codefendant had been convicted and was serving a life sentence. Yancy also argues the court’s instruction to the jury on aiding and abetting in accordance with former CALCRIM No. 400 was prejudicial error. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Yancy