legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re D.W.

M.A. (Mother) appeals from the August 29, 2011 jurisdictional and dispositional orders of the juvenile court adjudging minor D.W. a dependent of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b) (failure to protect), arising out of Mother’s arrest in a high-speed car chase and subsequent incarceration.[1] The Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) filed a letter of non-opposition to the appeal, conceding that the court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders “conflict with relevant case law.” Albert W. (Father) contends that substantial evidence supported the court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders. We agree with Mother and DCFS that the court erred in asserting jurisdiction over D.W. on the basis that she is currently incarcerated and unable to care for D.W.
We reverse the jurisdictional and dispositional orders of the court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale