In re M.V.
Following appellant M.V.’s admission to vehicle theft, the trial court placed him on probation and ordered him to pay the vehicle owner $5,072 in restitution. Of this amount, $2,500 was designated to replace the stolen vehicle, which was never returned to the owner. Appellant challenges the trial court’s valuation of the vehicle. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining the vehicle’s value, and affirm.
Comments on In re M.V.