In re R.M.
Mother argues the court erred in denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition.[1] This case involves twin boys, born in August 2008, and a third boy, I.M., born in July 2010. R.M., an older half-sister, has the same father as the three boys but not the same mother. Father and R.M. are not parties to the appeal.
We affirm the order of the juvenile dependency court.
Comments on In re R.M.