legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Mary F. v. Superior Court
Petitioner Mary F. is the mother of William D. and James D. She petitions for writ review of a juvenile court order terminating reunification services and setting a permanent plan selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 366.26. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) Petitioner claims that this order was not supported by substantial evidence and constituted an abuse of discretion in light of the “symbiosis of medical issues” that she faced during the review period which impacted her level of participation in the case plan.
We conclude that the court’s orders are supported by substantial evidence and it did not abuse its discretion in setting the section 366.26 hearing. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ review.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale