legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Velez
Defendant, Juan Martinez Velez, purports to appeal from his February 1, 2012 post-judgment order denying his motion to set aside his nolo contendere plea. We noted that the post-judgment February 1, 2012 order may not be appealable. We then issued an order to show cause re: possible dismissal of the appeal. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) The post-judgment February 1, 2012 order is not be appealable. (People v. Totari (2002) 28 Cal.4th 876, 886; People v. Cantrell (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 40, 43; People v. Bowles (1933) 135 Cal.App. 514, 516; see People v. Thomas (1959) 52 Cal.2d 521, 527; 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (2011 Supp.) Criminal Appeals, § 55A, p. 80.)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale