legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (Foster Wheeler) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury trial on John M. Nolen (John) and Sarah Nolen’s (Sarah) (collectively the Nolens) claims of strict liability and negligence arising from John’s exposure to asbestos during his work as a seller of water treatment chemicals for his employer Nalco Chemical Company (Nalco), from 1976 through 1979. The jury found Foster Wheeler liable to the Nolens and awarded them economic and noneconomic damages of over $8 million.
We find that under the recent decision of the California Supreme Court in O’Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335 (O’Neil), Foster Wheeler is not liable for injuries arising from asbestos-laden products to which John was exposed. Therefore we reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale