Brinkley v. Public Storage
Plaintiff asserts class action and individual claims for violations of the Labor Code. He alleges that defendant, his former employer, provided paystubs containing misstatements in violation of Labor Code section 226.[1] An employer, however, cannot be liable for misstatements on paystubs unless it knowingly and intentionally makes such misstatements and an employee suffers injury as a result. Plaintiff cannot prove either element in this case.
Plaintiff also asserts causes of action based on section 226.7 on the ground defendant failed to ensure that plaintiff and other class members took all meal and rest periods they were entitled to take. California law, however, only requires that employers make available such periods, which defendant did here. (Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1017 (Brinker).
We affirm the trial court’s order granting defendant summary adjudication with respect to plaintiff’s section 226 and section 226.7 causes of action.
Comments on Brinkley v. Public Storage