P. v. Shelton
Appellants Dwight Rolland Shelton and Joseph Allen Little challenge their convictions for making false financial statements, grand theft, forgery, and other crimes related to six real estate transactions. They maintain that the trial court adopted the role of prosecutor during their trial, that there was evidentiary error, and that they were improperly subjected to multiple punishments in contravention of Penal Code section 654; in addition, Little contends there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions, and Shelton contends that the abstract of judgment regarding his convictions contains errors.[1] With the exception of Shelton’s challenge to the abstract of judgment, we reject these contentions. We therefore order that Shelton’s abstract of judgment be modified, and otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Shelton