legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Richardson v. Matin
Benning and Christopher Richardson (Richardsons) appeal from orders granting the motions of defendants, Barbara Matin (Matin) and Wendell McArthur (McArthur), to quash service of summons for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Richardsons assert three grounds for reversal. They argue that Matin and McArthur had the necessary minimum contacts to warrant personal jurisdiction over them in California; that the trial court’s consideration of the motions to quash was beyond its authority because a motion to transfer was also pending; and that Matin and McArthur waived their personal jurisdiction defense through other actions taken in the proceedings. We conclude that the trial court properly found no constitutionally sufficient basis for California to exercise jurisdiction over either Matin or McArthur. Thus, we affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale