In re E.M.
Appellant G.N. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s October 19, 2011, order terminating parental rights to her then nine-year-old daughter E.M. and selecting adoption as E.M.’s permanent plan. Mother claims that insufficient evidence supports the court’s determination that the parental benefit exception to the adoption preference did not apply, and that the court should have instead selected guardianship or long-term foster care as E.M.’s permanent plan. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B).)[1] We reject this claim and affirm the challenged order.
Comments on In re E.M.