P. v. Caylao
Joe Caylao was convicted by plea of one count of grand theft in violation of Penal Code sections 484-487, subdivision (a).[1] He was placed on probation for three years and ordered to serve 300 days in jail. The court imposed various terms of probation, among them that he refrain from possessing or consuming alcohol or knowingly being in any place where alcohol is the primary item of sale. Caylao challenges this probation term on appeal, contending that it was not reasonably related to the crime of which he was convicted. On this record, which reveals that Caylao has a criminal history involving drug related charges, we reject the challenge and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Caylao