In re A.V.
In the dependency case of now three-year-old A.V. (son), the juvenile court terminated parental rights and established adoption as the permanent plan. (See Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[1] D.V. (mother) appeals, asserting the court erred by failing to apply the “benefit exception.†(See § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).)[2] As substantial evidence supports the court’s findings on this point, we affirm the court’s postjudgment order.
Comments on In re A.V.