P. v. Penaloza
Defendant Alberto Penaloza appeals his convictions on a number of felonies. He alleges the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony of the gang expert, in instructing the jury, and in failing to strike for sentencing purposes his prior “strike†conviction. He also alleges the evidence does not support his convictions for actively participating in a criminal street gang, and he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Finding no errors, we affirm.
I
Comments on P. v. Penaloza