legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sarsenstone Corp. v. Jewelinski
Plaintiff and appellant Sarsenstone Corporation (Sarsenstone)[1] appeals from two judgments dismissing its claims against (1) defendants and respondents Michael W. Griffith (Griffith) and FCI Lender Services, Inc. (FCI; collectively Griffith and FCI are referred to as the Griffith Defendants) and (2) defendants and respondents John Joseph “Jack” Jewelinski (Jewelinski), Vicki Jewelinski, and Tri-Hook Investments, Inc. (Tri-Hook; collectively, Jewelinski, Vicki Jewelinski, and Tri-Hook are referred to as the Jewelinski Defendants).
The trial court sustained the Griffith Defendants’ demurrers to Sarsenstone’s pleading without leave to amend, finding the statute of limitations barred all claims against the Griffith Defendants and Sarsenstone failed to allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action against the Griffith Defendants. The court later found the statute of limitations also barred Sarsenstone’s claims against the Jewelinski Defendants and therefore granted their motion for judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale