Van Horn v. Morgan
Plaintiff Danavon Horn[1] appeals from the judgment dismissing his action to remove his mother, defendant Melba Horn, as cotrustee of a family trust. Danavon contends the trial court erred in dismissing the action on the basis it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Melba and objectors Gary Horn and Lonna Horn contend the trial court properly dismissed the action under forum non conveniens principles. Melba also appeals, contending the trial court erred in finding it had personal jurisdiction over her. Although we disagree with the basis for the trial court’s ruling, we nonetheless affirm the judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction.
Comments on Van Horn v. Morgan