P. v. Dillon
Defendant Brian Steven Dillon appeals from his conviction of burglary of an occupied residence (Pen. Code,[1] §§ 459, 667.5, subd. (c)) and assault by means likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)). Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial after a juror testified she considered extrinsic evidence regarding the reliability of tracking in reaching a guilty verdict. Defendant further contends the trial court erred in failing to conduct a hearing regarding juror misconduct or, in the alternative, to release juror information to the defense. We find no error, and we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Dillon