Dickey v. City of La Habra
Kathleen Dickey and her husband, Charles R. Dickey,[1] appeal from a judgment in favor of the City of La Habra (the City), in this personal injury action. They alleged the crosswalk where Kathleen was struck by a car constituted a dangerous condition of public property. The jury returned a special verdict finding the crosswalk was not a dangerous condition. On appeal, the Dickeys contend: (1) the trial court erred by admitting evidence the accident was a “hit and run”; (2) testimony by a defense witness on redirect examination was inadmissible; and (3) the trial court erred by denying their new trial motion. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

Comments on Dickey v. City of La Habra

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced