legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lee
Judson Gillard Lee appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14 years of age. Lee argues the following: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded evidence of the victim’s prior inconsistent statement; (2) insufficient evidence supports one of his convictions for committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14 years of age; (3) this court should review the victim’s school records to determine whether they contain any evidence that would impeach the victim’s credibility; (4) the court erroneously imposed overbroad probation conditions; and (5) the court erroneously ordered the payment of the court security fee and court facilities assessment as probation conditions. Lee’s fourth claim has some merit but otherwise his contentions are unpersuasive. We affirm the judgment as modified.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale