P. v. Lee
Judson Gillard Lee appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of two counts of committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14 years of age. Lee argues the following: (1) the trial court erroneously excluded evidence of the victim’s prior inconsistent statement; (2) insufficient evidence supports one of his convictions for committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under 14 years of age; (3) this court should review the victim’s school records to determine whether they contain any evidence that would impeach the victim’s credibility; (4) the court erroneously imposed overbroad probation conditions; and (5) the court erroneously ordered the payment of the court security fee and court facilities assessment as probation conditions. Lee’s fourth claim has some merit but otherwise his contentions are unpersuasive. We affirm the judgment as modified.
Comments on P. v. Lee