P. v. Hass
Defendant and appellant Donald Wayne Hass contends that he is entitled to 76 additional conduct credits under the January 25, 2010 amendment of Penal Code[1] section 4019 (Sen. Bill No. 3X 18 (2009-2010 3d Ex. Sess.), Stats. 2009, ch. 28, § 50),[2] and the September 28, 2010 amendment to section 2933 (Sen. Bill 76, Stats. 2010, ch. 426, § 1, eff. Sept. 28, 2010).[3] He also contends that equal protection requires that he receive the additional presentence custody credits. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Hass