Camacho v. Colvin
Edson Camacho (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of respondents Lorraine and Ronald Colvin as trustees of the Colvin Family Trust, following an order granting respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend. Appellant contends that a valid cause of action was stated in his verified first amended complaint (FAC), and the trial court erred in granting the motion. We agree with respondents that critical allegations in the FAC contradict factual allegations contained in the original verified complaint, and appellant’s attempt to “plead around†those allegations fails. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Camacho v. Colvin