Marriage of Brownell
Charlotte Brownell Kent (appellant) appeals from an order entered October 28, 2010, vacating a money judgment in her favor entered June 26, 2006, which purportedly represented the balance her former husband, David Brownell (Brownell), owed to her on a $49,983 equalization payment awarded to appellant in their marital dissolution proceeding.[1] The trial court found the June 26, 2006, judgment was improper and erroneously entered because the equalization award had been satisfied. Appellant, who represents herself in this appeal, raises various claims challenging the trial court’s order vacating the judgment. We conclude her claims are meritless and therefore we will affirm.
Comments on Marriage of Brownell