legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Fuller v. Neyenhuis
Kenneth W. Fuller appeals from an order dismissing his cross-complaint against Dan Neyenhuis. The dismissal followed – albeit in rather circuitous fashion – the trial court’s order sustaining Neyenhuis’ demurrer to Fuller’s first amended cross-complaint. The court did give Fuller 20 days leave to amend, but Fuller submitted his proposed second amended cross-complaint two days late – apparently due to counsel’s illness – and was thus obligated to seek a court order allowing it to be filed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale