Southern Counties Oil v. FAMU
Defendants and Cross-complainants FAMU Corporation and So Young Nam appeal from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff and Cross-defendant Southern Counties Oil Co. According to defendants' opening brief, the judgment was based upon plaintiff allegedly having delivered fuel to a gasoline station operated by FAMU; Nam allegedly guaranteed the debt. Unfortunately for defendants the scanty record they designated does not even substantiate this contention. Defendants complain about the denial of a motion to continue the trial and reopen discovery. Although they did not furnish us with copies of any motion to continue or evidence filed in support of such a motion, they did provide a reporter's transcript of a hearing where a motion to continue the trial was discussed. We will therefore address this contention but conclude there is no showing the trial court abused its discretion and thus affirm the judgment.
Defendants raise four additional grounds for reversal of the judgment. None of these contentions are supported by the limited records supplied to us. We therefore cannot consider these issues.
Comments on Southern Counties Oil v. FAMU