Marriage of Rogers
Wendy Bevan appeals an order denying her request for a move away order and change of custody.[1] She asserts she was entitled to an evidentiary hearing before her request was denied. She also asserts the trial court erred in decreasing husband's child and spousal support obligation because he did not file an order to show cause seeking
such relief. She contends, in addition, that the trial court was biased and should have recused itself. We reverse that portion of the order denying the move away and change of custody requests and remand to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this issue. In all other respects, we affirm the order.
Comments on Marriage of Rogers