legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.L.
Y.R. (mother) and C.L. (father) appeal from the jurisdictional findings under section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g) of the Welfare and Institutions Code[1] as to their now 16-year-old daughter, R.L. Father also challenges the court's dispositional findings and orders, contending that the Department of Children and Family Services did not meet its burden of clear and convincing proof for R.L.'s removal, informal supervision could have adequately protected R.L., and the court abused its discretion when it ordered only monitored visitation for father. Father contends jurisdiction under subdivision (b) could not be based on his inability to control R.L.'s behavior in the absence of any credible evidence that he abused or neglected R.L. Mother concedes that she did not financially support R.L., but contends that jurisdiction under subdivision (g) was improper because father adequately provided for R.L. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale