In re R.L.
Y.R. (mother) and C.L. (father) appeal from the jurisdictional findings under section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g) of the Welfare and Institutions Code[1] as to their now 16-year-old daughter, R.L. Father also challenges the court's dispositional findings and orders, contending that the Department of Children and Family Services did not meet its burden of clear and convincing proof for R.L.'s removal, informal supervision could have adequately protected R.L., and the court abused its discretion when it ordered only monitored visitation for father. Father contends jurisdiction under subdivision (b) could not be based on his inability to control R.L.'s behavior in the absence of any credible evidence that he abused or neglected R.L. Mother concedes that she did not financially support R.L., but contends that jurisdiction under subdivision (g) was improper because father adequately provided for R.L. We affirm.
Comments on In re R.L.