P. v. Merida
Defendant Alan Merida appeals from the judgment entered following revocation of his probation. The appeal raises only sentencing issues. Primarily, defendant contends that he is entitled to an additional 60 days in presentence good time/work time custody credits. He relies upon an amendment to section 2933[1] that took effect two years after his actual custody but that was in effect when he was sentenced. We are not persuaded by defendant's arguments. Secondarily, the parties concede that some of the fee orders imposed as part of defendant's sentence need to be modified. We modify the judgment to reflect those concessions but in all other respects, affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Merida