In re Samuel S.
Celena G. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating parental rights to her sons, Samuel S. and Jon T. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[1] Her sole contention is that the court erred because it failed to ensure compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) before terminating her parental rights. We conclude that any error in the court's findings concerning compliance with the ICWA has been cured, and therefore, affirm.
Comments on In re Samuel S.