In re A.D.
Vanessa D. (Mother) challenges an order of the juvenile court terminating reunification services and setting a hearing to select a permanent plan for her one-year old daughter, A.D. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26).[1] Mother contends the juvenile court erred in finding that: (1) she failed to participate regularly and make substantive progress in her court-ordered treatment plan, and (2) there is no substantial probability A.D. might be returned to her within six months. (See § 366.21, subd. (e).) We deny the petition, as we conclude substantial evidence supports the juvenile court's order.
Comments on In re A.D.