legal news


Register | Forgot Password

D.B. v. Superior Court
D.B. (Mother) seeks extraordinary relief from an order of the San Francisco City and County Superior Court, Juvenile Division that terminated her reunification services and set a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1] to select a permanent plan for the minor J.B. (born October 2005). Mother challenges a finding in that order, that the San Francisco Human Services Agency (Agency) offered or provided her with reasonable services, claiming the Agency unreasonably failed to arrange for transportation costs to cover visitation between her and the minor. As discussed below, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding of reasonable services. Accordingly, we deny Mother's petition for an extraordinary writ on the merits.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale